I recently came across Clinton Forry’s inaugural post at the Brain Traffic blog, Content strategy, or, Let’s make a mix tape. I LOVED it (and wish I had thought of it myself. ) You should go read it.
Here’s the gist… Clinton had been digging through his box of cassette tapes (odd behavior for a content strategist—why weren’t they neatly organized in tidy Case Logic containers like mine?) when he had an epiphany. Content strategy and mix tapes are “shockingly” similar!
OK, you younger kids out there who grew up in the high tech world of CDs and MP3s are probably wondering what a mix tape is. Here’s how Clinton defined it. A mix tape:
- Is a compilation of songs (just as websites are collections of content)
- Created for a specific someone (consider your audience)
- Communicates a specific message (in service of business objectives)
- Should elicit a particular response (meet user needs/assist in task completion)
I immediately thought of this brilliant number from the hit Broadway puppet show, Avenue Q. Have a listen to experience how a simple compilation of songs created for someone sends a specific message, eliciting a particular response:
I recall that making a mix tape was hard: thinking of just the right songs; calling the radio station to request them and waiting for hours with your finger on the record button; dubbing them on the dual-cassette deck; making the hand-decorated case insert.
Goodbye mix tape, hello iTunes
Today, instead of mix tapes, we have iTunes genius mixes. No effort is required. You can find any song you want on-demand and download it. If there’s enough information about each of the songs in your library, iTunes will magically make a mix for you. Just like Amazon always recommends the perfect books… sorta. It’s not quite the same as a real person’s personal touch.
Content in Motion
About five years ago I was inspired by an article written by Piet Niederhausen at Georgetown University, Content in Motion: What iTunes Can Teach Us About Managing Web Content. In the article, Piet described how iTunes allowed music listeners to “liberate” their music from the confines of an album, allowing for countless playlists. He then related this idea to web content:
“An increasing number of Web sites are liberating their content from the confines of the Web page. We are creating structured content, tagging it with metadata, and letting each piece of content roam. We are sorting and grouping our content and creating containers where relevant content appears automatically. (Many of those containers are dynamic Web pages, but others include RSS feeds and Web services). Our content, abstracted from its presentation and encoded according to standards, is portable to different devices and can be shared between applications. We can adapt our content to create the experiences we want our users to have. Our content is in motion.”
I’ve since used this analogy countless times in presentations and with clients to move them away from their static, print-focused content mentality and better understand concepts of content reuse and syndication. It was a pretty effective tactic, but often set-up a false expectation that their new CMS technology would magically make this happen.
The technology is not the problem
Looking back, I realize too many of my clients weren’t ready for that yet. They were still wrestling with how to create useful and thoughtful content, regardless of what their CMS could do. I was so enthusiastic about the possibilities that I missed the clients’ limitations.
But even in those cases where they were ready for such an endeavor and could successfully implement and manage a complex system of content structures, relationships and tags, the end result was a dynamic site of loosely related mediocre content that collectively failed to tell the organization’s story.
Why was that? Had I known then what I know now, I might have recognized that this failure arose from a lack of content strategy. What they created was more genius playlist and less mix tape. There was no thought behind it. And that’s the KEY.
Remember, a mix tape was thoughtful. It was created for someone with an objective in mind. The songs were carefully chosen to send a particular message. You wouldn’t just create a tape of random songs and drop them off in any old locker at school hoping that somebody might be inspired by your musical prowess, would you?
The intersection of iTunes and mix tape
Imagine making an old-school mix tape (or a mix disk) with all of the current tools available to you. If you could remove all of the time-consuming technical barriers to making one, you could focus solely on the thoughtful part. The same can be true on your website.
Content management systems are, in fact, good tools and their ability to free your content to be reused and repurposed is amazing. Contrary to what some people think, the technology can make your job easier. It just won’t do your job for you.
A lot of folks these days are talking about content curation— the culling of carefully chosen pieces of content from across your domain to tell a story or reinforce your brand. Content curation is just like making a mix tape. If you want your audiences to know your organization is great at something, you can’t just say it. You have to build the case by presenting the evidence. Plan your strategy, gather the evidence, present your case, and let your website visitors be the judge. A better strategy with better evidence presents a better case.
This won’t happen by itself. And it won’t happen if you don’t have good content to curate. And good content, the right content, all starts with a content strategy. You have to know who you’re creating content for and why, before you create it. It’s the thought that counts… and what differentiates a mix tape from a playlist.
J. Todd Bennett is the co-founder and managing partner of decimal152, providing website [pre]design for do-good organizations.
Tags: cms, content strategy
Great post!
Love the tie with curation. This bit really hits it out of the park is this:
"If you want your audiences to know your organization is great at something, you can’t just say it. You have to build the case by presenting the evidence. Plan your strategy, gather the evidence, present your case, and let your website visitors be the judge."
All of these things, with the aforementioned recognition and planning based on the client's true capacity, will make for better sites and experiences.
Thanks for your terrific insight! Your remarks about client limitations, and false expectations struck home.
"Contrary to what some people think, the technology can make your job easier. It just won’t do your job for you."
Sometimes it feels as if an intervention may be required to help people understand the relationship between good content and their business objectives, to embrace, nurture, and curate their content, to care enough about it to dedicate resources to it.
Introducing a CMS to manage – well – content – in the absence of an ongoing strategy can certainly be an exercise in frustration. I admit to spending as much time steering people away from CMS as I do expounding the benefits.
Thanks for your comments, Clinton and Jeri!
It's interesting that you both noted client limitations/capacity as a key point here. It's so true, but a tough line to walk. On the one hand, you sell a grand vision to get the job. Lowered expectations don't win a lot of sales pitches. But helping them really understand what it will take to reach that grand vision (in time, people and money) should be one of our major charges. We can lead them down that path, but only biting off as much as they can chew.
I appreciate your input!
This post reminds me of High Fidelity with John Cusack. Two scenes stick out:
On organizing a record collection:
__________
Dick: I guess it looks as if you're reorganizing your records. What is this though? Chronological?
Rob: No…
Dick: Not alphabetical…
Rob: Nope.
Dick: What?
Rob: Autobiographical.
Dick: No effin way!
_________
AND about making a mixed tape:
Rob: The making of a great compilation tape, like breaking up is hard to do. It takes ages longer than it might seem. You gotta kick it off with a killer to grab attention. Then you gotta take it up a notch. But you don't want to blow your wad. So then you gotta cool it off a notch. There are a lot of rules. Anyway, I've started to make a tape, in my head, for Laura. Full of stuff she'd like. Full of stuff that'd make her happy. For the first time I can sorta see how that's done.
___________
That being said, High Fidelity is one of my top five movies of all time. ; )
I'll have to watch it again and apply what I learn to my content population.
Wow, that's really awesome! I haven't seen High Fidelity, but sounds like my kind of movie. See… content strategy is everywhere. You just have to look
Thanks for the great comment!
Hey J!
Just found your site and two posts in, I'm hooked. Keep up the good work.
What stuck out for me in this article is what you say about the modularity of content. The growing popularity of open source CMS is giving the non-programming types really sophisticated ways to manipulate data. And I think more and more people are learning how to make their content granular and they are learning the importance of separating the data of their content.
But are they separating the right content to tell the story? Some are, but I suspect many are not (and the kicker to me is that they know it, but don't know how to name what they are lacking).
All in all, I think the future seem bright for those involved in the strategic management of content.