Technology


11
May 10

iTunes, mixtapes and content management

I recently came across Clinton Forry’s inaugural post at the Brain Traffic blog, Content strategy, or, Let’s make a mix tape.   I LOVED it (and wish I had thought of it myself. ) You should go read it.

Here’s the gist… Clinton had been digging through his box of cassette tapes (odd behavior for a content strategist—why weren’t they neatly organized in tidy Case Logic containers like mine?) when he had an epiphany.  Content strategy and mix tapes are “shockingly” similar!

OK, you younger kids out there who grew up in the high tech world of CDs and MP3s are probably wondering what a mix tape is. Here’s how Clinton defined it. A mix tape:

  • Is a compilation of songs (just as websites are collections of content)
  • Created for a specific someone (consider your audience)
  • Communicates a specific message (in service of business objectives)
  • Should elicit a particular response (meet user needs/assist in task completion)

I immediately thought of this brilliant number from the hit Broadway puppet show, Avenue Q.  Have a listen to experience how a simple compilation of songs created for someone sends a specific message, eliciting a particular response:

I recall that making a mix tape was hard: thinking of just the right songs; calling the radio station to request them and waiting for hours with your finger on the record button; dubbing them on the dual-cassette deck; making the hand-decorated case insert.

Goodbye mix tape, hello iTunes

Today, instead of mix tapes, we have iTunes genius mixes. No effort is required. You can find any song you want on-demand and download it. If there’s enough information about each of the songs in your library, iTunes will magically make a mix for you. Just like Amazon always recommends the perfect books… sorta. It’s not quite the same as a real person’s personal touch.

Content in Motion

About five years ago I was inspired by an article written by Piet Niederhausen at Georgetown University, Content in Motion: What iTunes Can Teach Us About Managing Web Content. In the article, Piet described how iTunes allowed music listeners to “liberate” their music from the confines of an album, allowing for countless playlists. He then related this idea to web content:

“An increasing number of Web sites are liberating their content from the confines of the Web page. We are creating structured content, tagging it with metadata, and letting each piece of content roam. We are sorting and grouping our content and creating containers where relevant content appears automatically. (Many of those containers are dynamic Web pages, but others include RSS feeds and Web services). Our content, abstracted from its presentation and encoded according to standards, is portable to different devices and can be shared between applications. We can adapt our content to create the experiences we want our users to have. Our content is in motion.”

I’ve since used this analogy countless times in presentations and with clients to move them away from their static, print-focused content mentality and better understand concepts of content reuse and syndication. It was a pretty effective tactic, but often set-up a false expectation that their new CMS technology would magically make this happen.

The technology is not the problem

Looking back, I realize too many of my clients weren’t ready for that yet. They were still wrestling with how to create useful and thoughtful content, regardless of what their CMS could do. I was so enthusiastic about the possibilities that I missed the clients’ limitations.

But even in those cases where they were ready for such an endeavor and could successfully implement and manage a complex system of content structures, relationships and tags, the end result was a dynamic site of loosely related mediocre content that collectively failed to tell the organization’s story.

Why was that? Had I known then what I know now, I might have recognized that this failure arose from a lack of content strategy. What they created was more genius playlist and less mix tape. There was no thought behind it. And that’s the KEY.

Remember, a mix tape was thoughtful. It was created for someone with an objective in mind. The songs were carefully chosen to send a particular message. You wouldn’t just create a tape of random songs and drop them off in any old locker at school hoping that somebody might be inspired by your musical prowess, would you?

The intersection of iTunes and mix tape

Imagine making an old-school mix tape (or a mix disk) with all of the current tools available to you. If you could remove all of the time-consuming technical barriers to making one, you could focus solely on the thoughtful part. The same can be true on your website.

Content management systems are, in fact, good tools and their ability to free your content to be reused and repurposed is amazing. Contrary to what some people think, the technology can make your job easier. It just won’t do your job for you.

A lot of folks these days are talking about content curation— the culling of carefully chosen pieces of content from across your domain to tell a story or reinforce your brand. Content curation is just like making a mix tape. If you want your audiences to know your organization is great at something, you can’t just say it. You have to build the case by presenting the evidence. Plan your strategy, gather the evidence, present your case, and let your website visitors be the judge.  A better strategy with better evidence presents a better case.

This won’t happen by itself. And it won’t happen if you don’t have good content to curate. And good content, the right content, all starts with a content strategy. You have to know who you’re creating content for and why, before you create it. It’s the thought that counts… and what differentiates a mix tape from a playlist.

J. Todd Bennett is the co-founder and managing partner of decimal152, providing website [pre]design for do-good organizations.


12
Feb 10

Your website needs a [pre]design

Have you ever visited a redesigned website that looks nice, but is no more usable than before (or worse)? Did your organization implement a new content management system only to find your content never got any better? Were you disappointed when the new portal failed to revolutionize the way you work?

What are the first things many people think to do when their website has problems?

“Hire someone to redesign it! Get some new technology!”

Why? Because that’s what they always do. That’s what their competitors do. And quite frankly, they just don’t have the time or expertise to think about it. It’s a vicious cycle– a website gets redesigned, a tool gets implemented and people are happy with it for a little while. But old problems resurface, frustration mounts and it’s time to redesign again.
You blame the tool, blame the vendor, blame the people who work for you, but never blame the process.

Einstein defined insanity as “doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”

By this definition, the organizations we work with are ALL insane. So are we, and we admit it.

It’s so easy to fall into old patterns and behaviors. Trying to keep up with competitors, trends and the mounting pile of work in front of you leaves little time to think. You just do what you know. We have spent time on both sides of the table– the client side and the vendor side. In former roles, we redesigned hundreds of enterprise and small scale sites in response to a pre-determined scope of work spelled out in a complicated RFP. The projects usually addressed surface-level issues that resulted in nominal improvements in the look and usability of the site.

We have made our fair share of mistakes, but now we are learning from them. We had the tremendous benefit of a fresh start and new perspective that comes from creating a new company. We now find ourselves questioning everything we do and constantly asking “why?”

Here’s a sample from a Skype chat we had a shortly after starting decimal152 at the end of 2008:

Todd: [they] redesigned their website and it still sucks
Adam: that’s blunt
Adam: why does it still suck?
Todd: maybe the design or the cms was never the problem to begin with
Adam: or maybe it was, but it wasn’t done right
Todd: or maybe it was only part of the problem
Adam: or they got railroaded by a committee or a vendor
Todd: ahh, yes. like us.
Todd: in a past life :-)
Adam: people define scope for a redesign RFP without doing the predesign work to determine scope in the first place
Todd: we need to start with good research that leads to good strategy before tackling solutions
Adam: and educate the entire organization along the way

Let’s stop the redesign insanity! Ask questions. Think before copying what another organization is doing. What works for them may not work for you. Besides, how do you know if it even works for THEM? (Chances are they don’t know if it’s working either). Redesigning a website to fix a problem you haven’t fully diagnosed is like putting a band-aid on a tumor.

It’s time to focus on pre-design the research, strategy and planning that takes place BEFORE you decide to redesign your website.

We’re looking forward to an honest conversation… and lots of questions. We hope you’ll join us.

Side note: This is our very first blog post! We’re so glad you found it. If you care about your organization’s communications and the people responsible for getting them done, we hope you will subscribe to our blog. You can get updates on future posts by subscribing to our RSS feed, email updates, Facebook fan page, LinkedIn or Twitter. One last favor– help us get the word out and share this  with a friend! Thanks– Todd.